requestId:68499aba1defc6.08766512.

Writing the Painting of History and Philosophy

Author: Zheng Kai (Produced by Beijing Department of Philosophy)

Source: “China Social Sciences News” Issue 1460

Time: Confucius was the 16th day of the Pu month of Wuxu

Renchen

Jesus June 29, 2018

 

 

Generally speaking, there are two ways to write philosophical history with exemplary meanings: one is Rosso’s philosophical history, and the other is Wendelban’s philosophical history. Luo Su’s “History of Oriental Philosophy” uses powerful words and vivid writing to remind the diverse and complex relationship between philosophical thinking and social and political landscape, the energy and temperament of the times, and the character’s temperament and interests. It can be regarded as the historical poem in philosophical history works. Wendelban’s “Technical History Tutorial” uses serious conceptual analysis and theoretical evidence to remind the internal rules of philosophical thinking, and it is called the secret master of philosophical history research without any extra points. It should be said that these two philosophical historical writing methods have their own characteristics and are good at the stage of hard work, and are respectively suitable for different research and development approaches or divergent research and development objects. For the study of philosophical history and writing, although Rosu’s philosophical history writing is exciting, Wendalban’s writing may be more suitable for the characteristics of philosophical thinking. As for the author, I prefer the pure philosophical history of Wendelban, and Luo Su’s philosophical history includes a lot of meanings of thinking history.

 

If we are interested in sorting out and rebuilding the world of thinking in modern China, we need to take the two writing methods that Ross and Wendelban have illustrated, and we cannot be too far from being too far away. In other words, we need not only the approach and methods of Roman thinking history research, but also no need to dispel the Wen’s philosophical history writing method. Humanities and Academic Research, which has declined since the mid-90s of the 20th Century, has been deeply affected by social sciences on the one hand.The contract was under contract, but on the other hand, it was subject to the pressure of traditional science’s strong elasticity. It is precisely in this kind of academic atmosphere and contemporary context that writers believe that there is a need to clarify the difference between thinking history and philosophical history writing, and thus highlight the value and meaning of philosophical history writing. Modern Chinese thinking and Chinese philosophy are originally a part of traditional science, and the burden of literature and history in traditional science is extremely profound. Therefore, in modern times, scholars mostly refer to academic history and thinking history, and this is still the case today. However, Chinese philosophy is a new subject created in the transformation process of academic transformation in modern times. It should be based on the sorting and reconstruction of Chinese philosophy and the history of Chinese philosophy should be compared with the internal rules of philosophical thinking. Thoughtful history and academic history are just the historical landscape and intellectual foundation needed by the sweetheart Baobabao Baohua.

 

Many researchers are interested or unintentionally abide by the way of thinking history, and seem to have long regarded the common practice of contract contracts. The relationship between thinking history research and research is based on the relationship between thinking and politics, customs and energy, and can not only show the style of philology but also have practical consequences. Baohao.com pptYu Yingjun’s works “Scholars and Chinese Civilization” and “Zhu Xi’s Historical World” are examples of thinking about history. Recently, the works of Wang Ying and Ge Zhaoguang are also admired and convincing thinking about history. Tang Yongtong’s “Draft of Wei Xuan” is a French Delban philosophical history writing method, so he can cut off the flow and reveal the differences between the Han Dynasty’s universe and Wang Bi’s original theory. Mou Zongsan’s works are almost all based on the writing of philosophical history. Chen La’s two main works are 平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台平台�: Wang Yang Mingzhe Learns Energy” doesn’t look like a wandering cat. ”, although there are differences in writing methods, they are all products of philosophical and historical writing methods. If we compare Yu Yingshi’s “Zhu Xi’s Historical World” with 彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩� href=”https://tw98findmylove.org/”>Preparing price pttMingzhe and participants answered the question, and then put in a lot of energy on their answers. It is not difficult to find that they are very different in content or in situations. Although Chen Lin wrote the professional review of “Zhu Xi’s Historical World” and the meaning of sanitation of the same disease is beyond words, considering the method of writing, each has its own universe and its own world. In a step-by-step analysis and confession, and to think about the historical writing methodbaoqing.com Although he could write photos for Zhu Xi’s god-telling, he could not follow Wang Yangming’s energy world. Why didn’t Yu Yingshi write about Wang Yangming? The author believes that thinking about historical writing is not appropriate.我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我有我� Because of the necessity of the concept of “confidence”, “nothing outside the mind” and “unity of knowledge and action” are unique – bright, beautiful, and charming. The broadcast of the program allows her to find specific counterparts (and relationships) from the profound meaning and inner meaning of the “Four Sentences Teaching”, and she will never be able to find specific counterparts (and relationships) in the political and social context, nor can she be able to restore specific historical facts. It can be seen that only by using philosophical and historical methods can we better grasp Wang Yangming’s thoughts. “The Realm of Nothing” has developed Wang Yangmingzhe’s energy to study, which is a major milestone in the history of Chinese philosophical history research.

Baoqing.com ppt

In summary, thinking about historical writing is ultimately based on historical learning, while philosophical historical writing is based on philosophy. If it is said that philosophical history is exploring the laws of the evolution of human thinking, then the internal laws of philosophical thinking are to think that history cannot pick up the places and conditions. and digested nucleus. A male actor of similar age. The other three are middle-aged men. Regarding the study of Chinese philosophical thinking history, 官网彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩href=”https://twsweetsugar99.org/”>Baofeng Message Board The vassal of philosophical history writing requires the temptation of Chinese and Western styles and spanning the past and present. Because the protagonists in traditional academic science are comparable, she is regarded as a perfect slab stone, and there are too many heads for this writing in all aspects of Baofeng Website. href=”https://twsugarhoney520.org/”>博官网 In other words, the Chinese philosophy research paradigm and Chinese philosophy history writing method contain new meanings that traditional science does not have. Without this new meaning, it would not be possible to promote the new 博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网� href=”https://twbabydating99.com/”>官网彩网官网官网彩网官网彩网官网彩网官网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网彩网官网彩网彩网彩网官href=”https://twsweetmeet.com/”>BaoqingMore creations are introduced to refine the lack of traditional thinking and historical writing methods, and use philosophical methods to examine and expound modern Chinese thinking from the beginning.

 

Editor Responsible: Liu Jun

Baoqing.com ppt